Means of assessing the course are «satisfactory» and «unsatisfactory» on Sociology

Means of assessing the course are «satisfactory» and «unsatisfactory» on Sociology

A score of «satisfactory» is scheduled if:

– the writer regarding the course act as a entire understands the theoretical essence of the nagging issue being examined;

– the utilization of the program task is completed primarily in conformity using the theme, object, topic, function and goals, the plumped for methodology;

– coursework is descriptive;

– the strategy and types of the research are not completely sufficient into the methodology;

– not totally all research techniques meet all demands and / or are obtained from reliable sources;

– whenever analyzing the outcome for the research, statistical data processing techniques were utilized that did perhaps maybe not completely correspond into the tasks set;

– The test associated with research has reached minimum 10 individuals in the scenario of using quantitative and also at minimum 3 instances when it comes to making use of research that is qualitative practices (3 course). The test associated with the scholarly study has reached minimum 20 individuals within the instance of utilizing quantitative as well as minimum 5 situations when you look at the instance of utilizing qualitative research techniques (4 program);

– the outcomes acquired in the part that is empirical of work are followed by A interpretation that is superficial of information;

– the menu of sources utilized is very complete, the review that is bibliographic indicates, generally speaking, the paper writer elaboration that is necessary of literary works from the dilemma of program work;

– the purpose of the task had not been completely accomplished, not totally all the objectives were resolved;

– the last conclusions associated with program work are usually dependable, not adequately substantiated;

– the written text regarding the program work, a summary of sources utilized, applications are developed in basic relative to what’s needed with small flaws;

– the report on protection needless to say work is generally rational and convincing;

– the pupil fundamentally answers the questions that are additional, but wrongly utilizes the clinical categorical device, has problems in substantiating the plumped for research techniques.

The rating of «unsatisfactory » is placed if:

– there is non- conformity of use basic demands, breach of your order of preparation, guidelines and structural design regarding the work;

– applied insufficient techniques and research methods;

– research techniques try not to fulfill all demands and / or obtained from unreliable sources;

– there clearly was lack of the part that is empirical of work;

– separate scattered fragments of this text, rough sketches of work which do maybe perhaps not grow into the completed text of this program work are offered, whenever a not enough self-reliance into the performance associated with the program work (plagiarism) is found.

A grade of «unsatisfactory» means a student’s failure that is academic.

perhaps Not work that is allowing protect normally feasible.

The cause of non-admission needless to say work to protection is non-compliance of utilize basic demands, breach of this planning procedure, guidelines and structural design of this work, perhaps maybe perhaps not supplying the course strive to the investigation supervisor in addition to division on time without having a explanation.

Perhaps Not admission of coursework to protection, unsatisfactory mark in the defenseof coursework, failure to appear for defense without a good reason is recognized as scholastic financial obligation, that the pupil must expel in a prompt manner.

Protection of a program work

Defense is a general public procedure and it is held in the officially appointed time and time. The main topic of the program work and also the title for the author are declared. Then your expressed term is directed at the pupil. pupil’s presentation is quick (five minutes).

The elements that are following within the message:

1. The study subject, relevance.

2. The purpose and goals of this research.

3. The object for the research.

4. analysis practices.

5. Hypothesis (3-4 courses).

6. traits of this sampling technique.

7. link between the theoretical, piloting the empirical additionally the finished empirical research.

8. The practical importance of the outcomes. The presentation may be combined with a multimedia presentation.

The supervisor, as well as all those present, have at the end of a speech The right to ask the learning pupil concerns both regarding the substance regarding the problem he could be considering as well as on associated topics. During the final end regarding the protectionprocedure, the learning pupil is offered the chance to produce a summary. In it, he is able to yet again justify or explain their findings and react to criticisms. The manager announces the total outcomes of the protection.